Trail Reviews

I & M Canal Trail - Rusticness Revised by Erin Wade

The I&M Canal Trail runs from LaSalle, Illinois up towards Lake Michigan covering much of the northeastern area of the state in fits and starts. The trail head in LaSalle is relatively close by for me, and as such I’ve ridden it several times, with my longest outing thus far taking me from LaSalle to Ottawa and back, in part to obtain libations from Tangled Roots brewery.

Long sections of the trail on this route could euphemistically be described as rustic - while there are a few paved sections of the trail over this distance, most of it is dirt, and it can be challenging in places during the wetter seasons. But by far the most rustic portion of the trail has been this section:

Ford the mighty river

What you see in this picture is an honest-to-goodness water crossing. There is no formal bridge - someone has been kind enough to provide a narrow wooden causeway that simply lays across the stream bed, with ropes tethering it to trees to keep the current from simply carrying it away. In my experience with this section the causeway was in a different position each time. And, crucial for my purposes, it isn’t wide enough for all three wheels of the trike.

Not sure it’s gonna fit…

I’ve always had to carry the trike across. From my perspective this has always just been a part of the deal, but I am sure there are people who have arrived at this point and just decided that is the end of the trail for them. Understandably so.

However, the Canal Organization had put up a post indicating that the “washout between Utica and Ottawa” had been repaired. I assumed this was referring to the same spot. It was difficult to tell, however, because the picture that accompanied the post bore little resemblance to my recollection of how the area looked. Also, the word “washout” implied that there had been some sort of bridge (or maybe a culvert?) there before, and there was little about the appearance of the place that suggested it had ever been anything but open water.

In short: I wanted to see for myself if it was fixed.

I set out for a ride from the LaSalle trailhead to Buffalo Rock State Park, a route I’ve taken several times before. Life sometimes has a way of otherwise intruding on my riding opportunities, so I got started a little later in the day than I’d hoped. I arrived at the trailhead a little before three in the afternoon. With the sun setting around 4:30 this time of year, I knew that it would be getting dark on my way back.

Pro tip: if you are going to be riding at the end of the day, either leave the sunglasses behind, or at least bring along your regular glasses for when it starts to get dark. I myself would never forget to do this, and realize, hypothetically speaking, about four miles in that I had left my regular specs in the car.

Never…

Ahem. Anyway, I soldiered on, reasoning that the time lost riding back would only further ensure that I would be riding in the dark on the way back.

This being mid-November, I largely had even the more popular sections of the trail to myself. I headed out from LaSalle, dodged the potholes on the early portion of the trail, passed through Utica where they now have a bike rental station:

Bicycles for sale or rent… ok - just for rent.

And from there into the more rustic portions of the trail. The Canal National Heritage Area website says that the trail surface between LaSalle and Ottawa is “Part Crushed Limestone, Part Paved”. However, the interested rider should be aware that, in portions of this section, if there was ever crushed limestone laid down it has long since crumbled such that it is both microscopic, and been completely overgrown. Much of the trail between Utica and Buffalo Rock is grass with a single track dirt paths down it - sometimes just one, sometimes one on either side. The shot below is an example of this from May of this year:

Single track - May 2021

This isn’t bad for riding, per se, (though it can get soupy in spots when wet), but it’s likely not what people would expect given the description on the website.

And then I arrived at the crossing:

A bridge not too far

The bridge work completely transforms the area. I know it’s in the same spot, but it’s hard to reconcile the current presentation with what was there before. It takes what was literally a considerable obstacle to overcome and makes it a non-issue. People who are new to the trail will come to this point and likely give no thought to what the bridge is doing for them as they ride across. In fact, it seems likely that I will reach that perspective myself at some point in the future. It does make one appreciate what our ancestors had to contend with - many of the towns and cities in this region are located in part because they were good shipping points for river traffic and crossing points for ferries. All of that went to the wayside once the bridges were built.

The rest of the ride was largely uneventful. I made it to Buffalo Rock State Park - the sometimes treacherous clay soup sections were a little soft, but easily passable.

Of course, the last few miles of the ride were largely in dark, although this offered some views if its own:

Sunset on the canal

The interesting part of that shot to me is that it’s much lighter than what I was seeing. I knew, when I would look over top my sunglasses, that it wasn’t quite as dark as it seemed. Still, relative degree of light is just about all I can see without my glasses, so the sunglasses stayed on. But with lights in place and some careful riding, I was able to make it back to the LaSalle trail head without issue.

With the new bridge in place the trip along this section of trail will be much easier and more accessible to riders. And it makes the I&M Canal portion of the Rails to Trails coast-coast trail seem one step closer to being more feasible. It’s a win all around.

Thorn Creek Trail: Sauk Trail Lake Section - Trail Review by Erin Wade

This past week I found myself in the south-suburban area of Chicago, and that afforded an opportunity to explore a small portion of the Thorn Creek Trail.

Thorn Creek Trail Map

The overall trail is a 17.2 mile that winds it’s way through through multiple nature preserves in and around Park Forest and Chicago Heights. I did not have time on this outing to explore the entire trail, so I focused on a small loop set in Schubert’s Woods that goes around Sauk Trail Lake.

This is a three and a half mile loop that is almost entirely ensconced in trees, although you do periodically glimpse the roadways and buildings through the woods, and there is a brief section that runs alongside the road at the north end of the lake. But in other portions it is possible to feel like you are entirely out in the woods:

The trail is there somewhere…

Given that this is a woodland trail and that we are now entering the last third of Autumn, the trail was often partially - and sometimes entirely - covered with leaves. They appeared to be mostly oak leaves, which gave a pleasant and satisfying crackle and crunch under the wheels. The only caveat here is that, at times, it was a little challenging to know exactly where the sides of the path were.

The trail itself is asphalt, and (where I could see it) appeared to be very well maintained. It offered a smooth and comfortable riding surface throughout this section. In most areas it winds its way through the woods, leaving straight sections only for the portions that parallel roadways. Because it circles a small lake, fed by the eponymous Thorn Creek, there are some portions of rise and fall to it, particularly on the western side of the lake where the creek enters it. This is nothing dramatic - Cyclemeter registered no ascent or descent at all, but it seems to always underestimate on those measures[^1] - but it is there. This is not a perfectly flat trail.

As you get around to the western side of the lake you get some nice views of the water as well:

The trail was not in heavy use this autumn afternoon. I did encounter a handful of walkers - a couple of whom seemed a little surprised to encounter someone cycling on the path, perhaps not expecting it because of it being late in the season. But most of the time I was alone.

My time for riding was limited on this day, hence the relatively brief adventure. I viewed this mostly as an opportunity to get a sample of this trail system. If this short section is a reasonable representation of the rest of the trail, however, it seems like it could offer a pretty decent experience for a person looking for a riding opportunity in the area. The map shows it largely winding through forest preserves - and at one point along a golf course opposite the woods - with occasional roadway crossings. And at 17.2 miles it would offer a nearly 35-mile round trip end to end.

Probably the most challenging thing about using it was finding the right spot to join it. For example, the trail maps show the trail beginning, at the south end, at S Western Avenue and Steger Road. But while the trail does run to that point, there appears to be no practical location to park near that point - it’s just a fairly busy intersection. In fact, the trail at that point looks like something that isn’t finished yet - like they were planning to go further, but haven’t gotten to it yet.

All-in-all, a pleasant ride. If an opportunity presents in the future I’d like to explore the rest of the trail.

[^1]: This is one of the few downsides to Cyclemeter. It appears to me that it relies upon the altimeter in the phone to determine ascent and descent, while some other mapping programs, like Ride with GPS, appear to use topographical map data. Probably the most dramatic variance on this for me was on the Hilly Hundred. During that event I ran both Cyclemeter and Ride with GPS at the same time - Cyclemeter to track my ride, and Ride with GPS for the turn-by-turn directions (I had the phone hooked up to a battery pack - this is a battery-burning activity). On day two of that event, Ride with GPS tracked ascent at 3,262 feet, which is more or less consistent with what the event organizers indicate. Cyclemeter, on the other hand, recorded ascent at 1787 feet. It’s a difference 1475 feet, 45% less than the actual ascent. Not a big deal in the grand scheme of things - better to have a consistent measure over time for comparisons. But following an event focused on hill climbing it did leave me feeling a little like it was trying to cheat me…